In your answer, it is not necessary to include all points mentioned here. Students are advised to select and organize relevant content based on the provided editorial and the allocated word limit.

Answer Length Guide:

150 words – 10 marker
200–225 words – 15 marker
300 words – 20 marker
350 words – 25 marker
Essay-type answers – 1000 to 1200 words

Past Questions (UPSC Mains)

GS Paper II – Governance & Social Justice – 2019: “Discuss the challenges of governance in managing public events.” This editorial highlights lapses in Bengaluru’s stampede.
GS Paper III – Disaster Management – 2017: “Examine the role of urban planning in preventing crowd disasters.” This editorial critiques inadequate crowd control.

Probable UPSC Mains Questions

GS Paper II – Governance & Social Justice – Q1: “How do lapses in event management reflect governance failures?”
GS Paper III – Disaster Management – Q2: “Assess the role of urban planning in preventing stampedes.”
GS Paper I – Indian Society – Q3: “Discuss social media’s impact on crowd mobilization in urban India.”
GS Paper IV – Ethics and Human Interface – Q4: “Examine ethical responsibilities in ensuring public safety during events.”

Introduction (Sets the context with a striking fact and three sentences to outline the issue, highlight developments, and state significance, ensuring clarity and relevance for high marks.)
A stampede on June 4, 2025, killed 11 during RCB’s IPL victory celebration at Bengaluru’s M. Chinnaswamy Stadium. The John Michael D’Cunha Commission blamed RCB, KSCA, and police for reckless announcements and poor crowd control. Social media fueled a 3-5 lakh crowd against a 35,000-capacity venue. Effective urban planning is vital to prevent such tragedies.

Keywords / Important Terms (Using technical terms catches the evaluator’s eye, demonstrating precise knowledge and alignment with UPSC’s analytical expectations for top scores.)

Bengaluru Stampede: June 4, 2025, 11 dead, 71 injured.
RCB: Royal Challengers Bengaluru, IPL 2025 winners.
D’Cunha Commission: Blamed RCB, KSCA, police lapses.
Social Media: Triggered 3-5 lakh crowd surge.
KSCA: Karnataka State Cricket Association, stadium operator.
Crowd Control: Inadequate, 79 police outside.
FIR: Negligence, culpable homicide charges.

Flowchart (Visualizes complex dynamics, enhancing conceptual clarity, which impresses evaluators by showing structured thinking.)

Purpose: To map stampede causes and accountability.
Triggers: RCB’s social media, no permission, Vidhana Soudha event.
Linkages: Crowd surge → gate mismanagement → casualties.
Outcomes: Legal action, policy reforms, or urban planning gaps.

Core Issues / Root Causes (Identifying systemic issues with examples demonstrates depth, critical for scoring high by showcasing analytical rigor.)

No Permission: RCB’s unapproved event violated 2009 city order.
Social Media Misstep: Virat Kohli’s video fueled crowd chaos.
Inadequate Security: Only 79 police for 3-5 lakh fans.
Poor Coordination: KSCA, police failed to manage gates.

Impact Analysis (Multi-dimensional analysis with examples shows comprehensive understanding, boosting marks by addressing diverse aspects.)

Social: Eroded public trust, grief for 11 families.
Legal: FIRs against RCB, KSCA, DNA for negligence.
Economic: ₹25 lakh compensation per deceased family.
Governance: Exposed urban planning, crowd control gaps.
Ethical: Neglect of public safety by stakeholders.

Government Schemes / Policy Interventions (Linking specific schemes to issues shows policy awareness, earning marks for practical relevance.)

NDMA Guidelines: Crowd management protocols for events.
Smart City Mission: Enhances urban planning, infrastructure.
Karnataka’s New Rules: Stricter crowd control post - stampede.

Way Forward / Solutions (Feasible, structured solutions reflect forward-thinking, impressing evaluators with actionable insights.)

Enforce Permissions: Strict adherence to 2009 city order.
Enhance Security: Deploy adequate police for large events.
Regulate Social Media: Monitor event promotions for safety.
Urban Planning: Upgrade venues for flash crowd resilience.
Public Awareness: Educate on crowd safety protocols.

Ethical Dimensions (Highlighting ethical aspects aligns with GS Paper IV, enhancing marks by showing ethical sensitivity.)

Accountability: Stakeholders must prioritize public safety.
Transparency: Clear communication on event permissions.

Conclusion (Summarizes key elements, offers a positive, visionary opinion, and reiterates the introduction’s sentiment with a mature, impactful tone for higher scores.)
The Bengaluru stampede underscores systemic lapses in crowd management. Robust planning and accountability can prevent future tragedies. India’s urban future demands resilient, safety-first governance.

Editorials